On Mon, 16 Jul 2012, Guido Flohr wrote:
On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 13:44 +0300, Guido Flohr wrote:
If I see it correctly, I could solve my problem by extending the series
of standard deviations arStddevTable[]. But where do the numbers come
from?
If I extend the series by just one value I have to use 1.97, a value
that looks very high to me, so that the assertion no longer fails.
If I extend the list instead by two values, 1.79 and 1.81, and also
change the factor from 6.0 to 7.0 the assertion also no longer fails.
I don't really understand what the code there does, but looking at the way
it does it, I'd be inclined to let everything related to stddevs unchanged
but increase the 6.0 value (in your case, to 6.0 * sqrt(100/64)).
FWIW, there is an email address for David Montgomery here :
http://www.bgonline.org/forums/webbbs_config.pl?noframes;profile=david+montgomery
You could try to ask him directly.
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
