Hi, On Sun, 2013-03-10 at 23:49 +0100, Rasmus Althoff wrote: > Bug/idea: When doing a match analysis, the evaluation of the players > does not match the Gnu BG strength settings. I regularly outplay Gnu BG > in matches at setting "casual", but both I myself and Gnu Backgammon (at > setting "casual") only get an "awful" in the match analysis. > > Proposal: The analysis should match the GNU strength setting. Overall, > GNU at casual setting should receive the strength evaluation "casual", > and the human player accordingly. That would make it easy to choose the > appropiate strength in the engine options.
The better the player that analyses another player, the more accurate the analysis will be. GNUBG supremo analysing your play will probably reveal more errors in your play than GNUBG expert does and will give you a different rating. That means that the estimated strength does not only depend on your real strength but also on the strength of the analyzing player. An implementation for your feature request would first require a fixed setting for the analysis, and then probably a lot of try and error until the names of the skill levels approximately match the analysis results. Lots of work and maybe not that helpful at the end of the day. Guido -- Империя ООД | Imperia OOD ул. „Княз-Борис-I“ № 86, София 1000 | ul. "Knyaz-Boris-I" № 86, Sofia http://www.imperia.bg/ _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
