Michael Petch <[email protected]> writes: > On 21/07/2013 7:59 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> "either version 3 or later of the License, or (at your option) any >> later version," > I agree that source files without a GPL header should have them added. I > haven't counted how many fall into this category. I (and other > developers) can fix this when time permits. As for the unusual wording > above, I couldn't even find it in any of the GPLv3's drafts so not sure > how it made it into the code base. It should read: > "either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later version." It looked like it was specific to the files that were originally LGPL and were relicensed, and I suspect it was just an accident of rewording the license notice instead of copying and pasting the regular GPLv3 license statement. Thank you for your quick review! As soon as I have a moment, I'm going to work on a patch that lets gnubg search in $localstatedir/lib/$PACKAGE as well as $pkgdatadir for files and submit it for review. That will let me drop the last Debian-specific modifications to the package. I just uploaded 1.01.003-1 to Debian unstable. Sorry about how embarassingly long it took me to upload the package. Thank you so much for the regular versioned release! It makes the packaging process a lot easier. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
