Thanks! Out of interest, I was wondering if someone could give an example of a case where the 2 sided database would be different from the one-sided database? I had assumed that if you apply the database to both sides and have the full distribution, you could work out the optimal move just using this one-sided database?
Apologies if this is in the wrong list, happy to be directed to the appropriate list/forum. ________________________________ From: Philippe Michel <[email protected]> Sent: 31 December 2016 14:45 To: isambard mews Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bug in bearoffdump? On Tue, 27 Dec 2016, isambard mews wrote: > I tested out bearoffdump on a test database using normal distribution > format and got the following strange output (running on a 64bit Debian > system). I was expecting a similar format to a non-ND database and > wonder if this is a bug: The problem is fixed in the current sources. If you use the debian package I suppose you will have to wait until it is updated, but if you compiled gnubg yourself you can update it from cvs or get the only changed file from http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/*checkout*/gnubg/gnubg/bearoff.c?revision=1.101 Best regards, Philippe Michel
_______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
