Windows 7 64-bit pro Version 1.05.000-mingw 32-Bit 20150725 AMD FX 8350 4GHz
I've run several CPU-vs-CPU matches with the following settings, and the 1-ply player almost always outperforms the 2-ply player: Player 1: Checker Play Lookahead: 1-ply Cubeful evaluation Neural-net pruning Noise: 0 No move filter Cube Play Lookahead: 1-ply Cubeful evaluation Neural-net pruning Noise: 0 Player 2: Checker Play Lookahead: 2-ply Cubeful evaluation Neural-net pruning Noise: 0 No move filter Cube Play Lookahead: 2-ply Cubeful evaluation Neural-net pruning Noise: 0 I've tried swapping the players, using different dice generators (random.org, MT), but the 1-ply player almost ALWAYS beats the 2-ply player on my machine, by A LOT, even winning by a gammon a fair amount of the time. Very strange. Shouldn't the 2-ply player be a lot better than the 1-ply player? I've tried running with & without NN pruning, move filters, etc, but I always get the same result! What's going on? Here's a typical 10-point match game where the 1-ply player beats the 2-ply player 11 to 6: https://hexandoct.000webhostapp.com/1-ply-2-ply_10p_2017-03-12.sgf _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
