Thomas Malloy wrote:
I would be pretty insulted if I was a gnubg developer. I mean really. What kind of a pimple dick would you have to be to put some sort of cheating code into the program?
In fact there was a version of GNU Backgammon that had cheating code. It wasn't hidden, however; as I understand it, the idea behind it was to demonstrate what real cheating looks like, and thereby to demonstrate how the non-cheat mode was nothing like that. But of course this plan was a failure and I believe that most GNU developers regretted that episode.
In any case, it looks like most people in this thread don't understand the points I'm making (which I guess I should have anticipated since I'm trying to use logic to convey it...) so I'll let the matter drop.
Tim _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
