I'd go with 0.1 for the Blunder. I think that's common usage, so it would make sense. Then 0.05 for Error is a nice threshold ,and as you suggest, 0.02 or 0.03 for Mistake.
* Ian -----Original Message----- From: Bug-gnubg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Philippe Michel Sent: 08 January 2019 21:32 To: [email protected] Subject: [Bug-gnubg] Errors tagging in analysis Currently, in GNUbg analysis, bad moves or cube decisions are tagged doubtful, bad or very bad when they lose 0.04, 0.08 or 0.16 point. These are default values and can be changed in the Settings/Analysis panel. Looking at recent discussions in online forums (recent being in the last few years, not *very* recent), it seems the generally accepted thresholds are now somewhat lower. Moves wrong by 0.02-0.03 deserve consideration, 0.10 is a serious blunder, something like that. Would anyone mind if these default values were cut by 1/4, to 0.03, 0.06 and 0.12 ? _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
