I'll work on that. On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 1:46 AM Christian Anthon <[email protected]> wrote:
> If somebody rewrites the text, I should be able to update the pages. > > Cheers, Christian. > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 1:34 PM Ian Shaw <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi David, >> >> >> >> Thanks for the report. >> >> >> >> Yes, this is an error. I’m not sure who maintains, those pages now. >> >> >> >> n Ian Shaw >> >> >> >> *From:* Bug-gnubg [mailto:bug-gnubg-bounces+ian.shaw= >> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *David Klausa >> *Sent:* 08 January 2020 17:56 >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* EPC correction >> >> >> >> On GNUBG's discussion about EPC ( >> https://www.gnu.org/software/gnubg/manual/html_node/What-does-epc-mean_003f.html), >> the example of 5 checkers on the 1-point and 4 checkers on the 2-point is a >> typical 5-roll position. Therefore, it appears to be an error to say that >> the expected number of remaining rolls is 2.189. A 5-roll position is >> elsewhere calculated to be an EPC of 36, not 17.878. So unless I am missing >> something this seems to be a mistake. >> >
