On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 3:10 PM Aaron Tikuisis <[email protected]>
wrote:

> That is interesting, I did not realize that gnubg misplays race positions
> much. What are some examples?
>

 Here is a position I posted a few weeks ago.

GNU Backgammon  Position ID: 960BAMCw+0MAAA
                 Match ID   : cAkAAAAAAAAA
 +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+     O: gnubg
 |                  |   |    O  O  O  O  O | O   0 points
 |                  |   |    O     O  O  O | O
 |                  |   |             O  O |
 |                  |   |             O    |
 |                  |   |             O    |
v|                  |BAR|                  |     (Cube: 1)
 |                7 |   |                  |
 |                X |   |                  |
 |                X |   | X                |
 |                X |   | X  X           X |     On roll
 |    X           X |   | X  X           X |     0 points
 +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+     X: oystein

Money game and X to play. Try several rolls, like 52, 31 and 53 and... at
0-ply. What's the best move? 52: 6/1 6/4?
Of course, the evaluator reports 0.0 win, but since the gammons are
incorrectly evaluated by the neural network, it makes ridiculous moves.
It looks like this is a common pattern in positions which are "skewed".

-Øystein

Reply via email to