You can probably write a 5kg book about positions where a bot plays different moves at 0-ply and 1-ply. No bot is good at all types of positions.And remember, to get the higher plies the bot need to "play" the position to this depth. With a tricky position many moves might be inaccurate, so the higher ply is not always correct as well. Same for rollouts.
-Joseph On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 at 04:02, pierre zakia <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi everybody, > > > In the position here below, I am curious to understand what in Gnubg > engine yields such discrepancy between 4 ply and roll out. > > > GNU Backgammon ID de position: G27HAAiY2+ABAw > > ID de match : MAHyAAAAAAAE > > +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+ O: gnubg > > | O O | | O O X | 0 point > > | O O | | O O | Dés jetés 44 > > | | | O | > > | | | | > > | | | | > > ^| |BAR| | Match en 7 points (Videau > : 1) > > | | | | > > | O | | | > > | O X | | X | > > | O X X X | | X O X X | > > | O X X X | | X O X X | 0 point > > +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+ X: pierrez > > Pip counts : O 148, X 106 > > > *4 ply results *: > > *13/5 13/9(2) *+0,579 > > 0,684 0,135 0,005 - 0,316 0,098 0,002 > > *20/16(2) 13/9(2) *+0,570 (* -0,008*) > > 0,675 0,083 0,003 - 0,325 0,082 0,001 > > *13/5(2) *+0,436 ( -0,143) > > 0,611 0,122 0,003 - 0,389 0,065 0,001</td> > > > *Roll out :* > 1. Roll out *20/16(2) 13/9(2)* Eq.: +0,783 > > 0,709 0,078 0,003 - 0,291 0,089 0,000 CL +0,415 CF +0,783 > > [0,011 0,006 0,000 - 0,011 0,012 0,012 CL 0,026 CF 0,053] > 2. Roll out *13/5 13/9(2) * Eq.: +0,576 (* -0,207*) > > 0,675 0,138 0,004 - 0,325 0,101 0,002 CL +0,389 CF +0,576 > > [0,002 0,003 0,000 - 0,002 0,002 0,000 CL 0,004 CF 0,007] > 3. Roll out *13/5(2) * Eq.: +0,549 ( -0,233) > > 0,634 0,105 0,003 - 0,366 0,044 0,056 CL +0,338 CF +0,549 > > [0,008 0,009 0,001 - 0,008 0,007 0,055 CL 0,020 CF 0,049] > > > I am more interested in the relative equity (bold font) between the first > 2 moves than in the respective absolute equity of the same moves. > > > Thanks in advance to shed some light on this. > > > Pierre > >
