All details count: less or less-equal, round or not-round etc The best, as I said, is K*. But if you do "plain" Keith, do it *with* rounding.
-Joseph On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 at 10:46, Philippe Michel <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 10:48:09AM +0100, Øystein Schønning-Johansen wrote: > > > Will rounding down to the nearest integer (floor) solve the issue? > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 11:21:18AM +0000, Christian Anthon wrote: > > > I believe I looked at this a long time ago but opted to keep it as it > > was. It is an approximation anyway. Your changes otherwise looks > > right. > > Both are approximations but the first one is the Keith count as > described and the current code something possibly slightly confusing > when the "Keith Count Leader(+1/7)" is shown with a decimal digit. > > In addition to the matter of < vs. <= you mention, wouldn't it be > preferable to show the double and take criteria separately? Something > like: > > Keith Count Leader : 35 > Keith Count Leader(+1/7) L: 40 > Keith Count Trailer T: 38 > > Redouble (since L <= T+3) > Take (since L >= T+2) > >
