Il 12 giugno 2026 alle 17:24 Louis Zulli ha scritto:
> 1. Cubeful 4-ply 13/11 10/6 Eq.: -1.709
> 0.179 0.014 0.000 - 0.821 0.630 0.000
> 4-ply cubeful prune [4ply]
> 2. Cubeful 4-ply 13/7 Eq.: -1.709 (-0.000)
> 0.189 0.015 0.000 - 0.811 0.637 0.000
> 4-ply cubeful prune [4ply]
> 3. Cubeful 4-ply 12/8 10/8 Eq.: -1.711 (-0.002)
> 0.191 0.014 0.000 - 0.809 0.644 0.000
> 4-ply cubeful prune [4ply]
> 4. Cubeful 4-ply 13/9 10/8 Eq.: -1.719 (-0.010)
> 0.185 0.014 0.000 - 0.815 0.641 0.000
> 4-ply cubeful prune [4ply]
>
> GNU Backgammon 1.06.002 Jan 29 2022 --- looks like I need to upgrade.
Not so fast :P
4-ply evaluation on 1.08.003 20251217 gives similar result to yours.
1. Cubeful 4-ply 13/11 10/6 Eq.: -1.708
17.9 1.4 0.0 - 82.1 63.0 0.0
4-ply cubeful prune [4ply]
2. Cubeful 4-ply 13/7 Eq.: -1.709 (-0.000)
18.9 1.5 0.0 - 81.1 63.8 0.0
4-ply cubeful prune [4ply]
3. Cubeful 4-ply 12/6 Eq.: -1.710 (-0.002)
18.1 1.4 0.0 - 81.9 63.3 0.0
4-ply cubeful prune [4ply]
4. Cubeful 4-ply 12/8 10/8 Eq.: -1.711 (-0.002)
19.1 1.4 0.0 - 80.9 64.4 0.0
4-ply cubeful prune [4ply]
I ran mine on 2-ply because that is what is default on GNUbg. 3-ply
comes up with fine results too.
