-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 3/14/2013 2:38 AM, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 03/13/2013 07:11 PM, Phillip Susi wrote: > >> If anyone is going to use it then it may be worth the bother. > > MIT Kerberos relies on fsync (invalid_fd) returning -1, so I > suppose it's worth the bother.
It does? How so? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRQd2aAAoJEJrBOlT6nu75r1AH/1hv4AO7+EB1cS5srcMh/NHq lpGMSUByD1yXA9r8Wz4yUU3N2P7i24C0bF4rEde3J4C8ckpqosibGzt1jAdsktZq Q80Sl7xn/Jli6Bk+lTA14MM7On7wxtWnt4oh4LpgLcaC4LF7jOn3A9ovcCeKL8Nm lrW6+AUMeT2isB6ufSe3lKCnA6iAUNmCAjU5XJnyBUHUhEwQAx3l4bdDFhGDIdPM GDDY/UE1pyHgZ6aTCFAk3jWbKaWTpuic/3elAwT+lgecnJO5ex7ImF2rvQ/vq4fG hecQJCsQ+BJC+BGTE7q9DAAzjSB6omCfgBQ6OyGbd41ndBtNtSmGELruT7AYVAI= =1F6N -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
