Paul Eggert <[email protected]> writes: > Thanks, I pushed the following to try to fix that. > Does it work for you now?
Yes, all those 3 tests pass now. Thanks for the quick fix. Regards, -- Daiki Ueno
- [PATCH] tests: don't assume getdtablesize () <= 10000000 Paul Eggert
- Re: [PATCH] tests: don't assume getdtablesize () <= 1... Jim Meyering
- Re: [PATCH] tests: don't assume getdtablesize () <= 1... Daiki Ueno
- Re: [PATCH] tests: don't assume getdtablesize () <... Paul Eggert
- Re: [PATCH] tests: don't assume getdtablesize ()... Daiki Ueno
- Re: [PATCH] tests: don't assume getdtablesize () <= 1... Eric Blake
- [PATCH 1/2] getdtablesize: work around cygwin issue Eric Blake
- [PATCH 2/2] dup2, dup3: work around another cygwin c... Eric Blake
- [PATCH 0/2] Avoid cygwin dup2 bugs Eric Blake
