Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Ouch, I didn't think of that.  Any further opinions from people more
>> well versed in English and command line parameter naming than me?
>> Perhaps we should change it to --symlink after all.
>
> I have a very mild preference for --symbolic.
>
> We could support both spellings.

It does now.

...
      --symbolic, --symlink Make symbolic links instead of copying files.
...


_______________________________________________
bug-gnulib mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib

Reply via email to