Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I find that avoiding 'rm' is usually better, so I'd lean towards ln -s > -f if it is portable. But it probably isn't...
Originally "ln -f A B" meant "don't worry if A is a directory; hard-link it to B anyway". Over the years there has been a lot of confusion about the transition between the old meaning and the current one, and I still don't entirely trust "ln -f". _______________________________________________ bug-gnulib mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
