> Would it make sense to give meaning to `configure; make; make install' > within gnulib to install gnulib-tool onto the user's preferred > location? And would an option such as `gnulib-tool --location' that > outputs the location of gnulib's database be a useful addition?
I'd vote for the latter over the former. gnulib-tool isn't really meant to be installed, and adding support for that would take some work. Thanks for the patch. I installed this minor variant: --- gnulib-tool 21 Apr 2005 22:10:05 -0000 1.44 +++ gnulib-tool 13 May 2005 07:01:19 -0000 1.45 @@ -699,8 +699,8 @@ func_import () echo echo "You may need to add #include directives for the following .h files." for module in $modules; do - func_get_include_directive "$module" | sed -e '/^$/d;' -e 's/^/ /' - done + func_get_include_directive "$module" + done | LC_ALL=C sort -u | sed -e '/^$/d;' -e 's/^/ /' echo echo "Don't forget to add \"$sourcebase/Makefile\"" echo "to AC_CONFIG_FILES in \"$configure_ac\" and to mention" _______________________________________________ bug-gnulib mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
