Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Patrice Dumas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> alloca malloc realloc strtod atexit dup2 getcwd getpagesize memmove memset >> strerror regex > > These are mostly equivalent to existing and widely used LGPLed code, > so I'd say they should be LGPLed. > > I would say the one exception is getcwd, where the code to support > arbitrarily-deep nesting is not LGPLed anywhere that I can see. For > that case I would suggest adding a getcwd-lgpl module that omits the > deep-nesting capability, much as we have already done (for similar > reasons) with fts and fts-lgpl. > > Bruno, Jim -- do you have any objections to relicensing these?
Changing them from GPL to LGPL is fine with me. _______________________________________________ bug-gnulib mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
