Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The problem you describe was more of an automake limitation, and >> it has been resolved by automake's addition of AC_CONFIG_LIBOBJ_DIR. > > Interesting. But AC_CONFIG_LIBOBJ_DIR is documented just between > AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR and AC_CONFIG_HEADERS, which makes me believe that > only a single call to AC_CONFIG_LIBOBJ_DIR in one configure.ac is > supported. In this case, it wouldn't help gnulib-tool. Can you confirm > the contrary?
I haven't used it, but the example in the test case does work that way. > Also, do you have an idea about the release date of automake-1.10? No. I can't even predict a release date for coreutils :) _______________________________________________ bug-gnulib mailing list bug-gnulib@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib