Paul Eggert wrote:
Here is a slightly different proposal to add that module; it assumes
the 'canonicalize' changes I just installed. What do you think?
Looks good to me. I like your idea of sharing canonicalize.h between
the two implementations. FWIW, using your implementation
./gnulib-tool --create-testdir --dir=/tmp/testdir canonicalize-lgpl
cd /tmp/testdir && ./configure && make
works as expected, both on cygwin (where canonicalize_file_name() is
missing) and on linux (where it is present but not declared).
I guess the basic idea here is that we move this module from gettext
to gnulib, so I haven't worried about config/srclist.txt.
That's up to Bruno.
2006-11-03 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
New module canonicalize-lgpl, proposed by Charles Wilson.
* MODULES.html.sh: Add canonicalize-lgpl.
* lib/canonicalize-lgpl.c: New file, taken from
gettext/gnulib-local/lib/canonicalize.c with license changed to GPL
because of gnulib-tool.
* m4/canonicalize-lgpl.m4: New file, taken from
gettext/gnulib-local/m4/canonicalize-lgpl.m4 with the following changes:
should be "taken from gettext/gnulib-lcoal/m4/canonicalize.m4 ..."
--
Chuck
