On 19 Feb 2007, at 23:17, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Yes it does. I'm not sure which is which now either. I remember thatI did much of the work on a v2 release, and Paolo did something verysimilar but we each did the work independently of the other. There issome reconciling to be done there too.My copy is in ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/smalltalk/smalltalk-2.3.3.tar.gz AFAIK, I have all the bugfixes from Gary and Bruce's stuff there.
Then we should probably take that one as the basis for submission to gnulib,
unless there is a consensus that Bruce's version is preferable for some
reason. Either way, having a single flavour maintained outside of both
smalltalk, autogen (and m4 eventually) is a big win all round.
Cheers,
Gary
--
())_. Email me: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
( '/ Read my blog: http://blog.azazil.net
/ )= ...and my book: http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
`(_~)_ Join my AGLOCO Network: http://www.agloco.com/r/BBBS7912
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
