Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jim Meyering wrote: >> A *lot* of code expects malloc and realloc to set errno when they fail. > > Such code is not portable to plain ISO C 99 systems.
We could extend gnulib's existing malloc/realloc wrappers to ensure that malloc/realloc set errno when they fail, if it is worthwhile to do so. -- Ben Pfaff http://benpfaff.org