Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> A *lot* of code expects malloc and realloc to set errno when they fail.
>
> Such code is not portable to plain ISO C 99 systems.

We could extend gnulib's existing malloc/realloc wrappers to
ensure that malloc/realloc set errno when they fail, if it is
worthwhile to do so.
-- 
Ben Pfaff 
http://benpfaff.org



Reply via email to