Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Jim Meyering wrote: >>> A *lot* of code expects malloc and realloc to set errno when they fail. >> >> Such code is not portable to plain ISO C 99 systems. > > We could extend gnulib's existing malloc/realloc wrappers to > ensure that malloc/realloc set errno when they fail, if it is > worthwhile to do so.
It is definitely worthwhile to do so.
