Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: >> It's worth noting in documentation that with the replacement function, >> opening-for-write any name ending with a slash (regardless of >> whether the non-trailing-slashed name exists) will always fail. > > IMO that's already clear from POSIX [1], which says: ... > But I can certainly add a comment in the code... ... > + ends withone or more trailing slashes shall be resolved as if a
Thanks. Now that the comments also say this affects open-for-write, it's clearer. s/withone/with one/
