Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > AC_FUNC_MALLOC should define malloc to rpl_malloc and > the code from the malloc module should be used and fix this issue, no?
My modules don't use AC_FUNC_MALLOC. From a performance perspective, I see no point in adding an extra function call for every malloc invocation, while only few among these invocations can actually be called with a zero argument. From a standards perspective, I stick with ISO C99 and POSIX. Bruno
