-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 According to Jim Meyering on 10/1/2009 2:11 AM: > Maybe I'm the only one who uses "make major" > or who has been bothered about the semantic mismatch > in doing so for a so-called "minor" (yet stable) release. > > I debated whether to keep "major" for a transition period, > but I don't think that would be worthwhile. > > Any objection?
Looks good to me. I feel like there are two reasonable sets of release naming conventions, which convey slightly different meanings: major minor patch stable beta alpha and your patch gets rid of the mixing of two different notions. - -- Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well! Eric Blake [email protected] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin) Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkrEi10ACgkQ84KuGfSFAYAi6QCfdkT5xWwUysdjs4ozxrDBx7kS ZwMAoJMm7z4Zt+HQn9mhZHsDQO6132Hp =RfaG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
