I noticed this while bootstrapping m4; <ignore-value.h> stood out like a sore
thumb when sorted among the list of system headers, when all other gnulib-
specific headers used by m4 used "". Any objections to this patch? I did not
touch eealloc, although that is another module that could probably be changed
in the same manner.
From: Eric Blake <e...@byu.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:42:55 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] ignore-value: update recommended header name
* modules/ignore-value (Include): Only use <> for headers that
exist in glibc.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <e...@byu.net>
---
ChangeLog | 6 ++++++
modules/ignore-value | 2 +-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index ee23708..9779709 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2010-01-25 Eric Blake <e...@byu.net>
+
+ ignore-value: update recommended header name
+ * modules/ignore-value (Include): Only use <> for headers that
+ exist in glibc.
+
2009-11-17 Eric Blake <e...@byu.net>
manywarnings: add more warnings
diff --git a/modules/ignore-value b/modules/ignore-value
index d43200e..8d48863 100644
--- a/modules/ignore-value
+++ b/modules/ignore-value
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ Makefile.am:
lib_SOURCES += ignore-value.h
Include:
-<ignore-value.h>
+"ignore-value.h"
License:
LGPLv2+
--
1.6.4.2
