Reuben Thomas <[email protected]> writes: > Given the example rule, the cyclo-${PACKAGE}.html file must be deleted > in order to be remade, as the rule's target is itself > cyclo-${PACKAGE}.html, with no dependencies. It would be more useful > if either the rule depended on the sources (best), or if the target of > the rule were, say, simply "cyclo", so that it was always remade. > > Opinions?
I'd prefer the first approach. Unconditionally invoking a rule like this may leads to problem if the user doesn't have the necessary tool, and the file is up to date anyway. /Simon
