Eric Blake wrote:

> libvirt would like to use sigaction as LGPLv2+, given that sigaction()
> is provided by libc.
>
> The sigaction module is currently LGPLv3+, and already depends on
> LGPLv2+ sigprocmask and signal modules, so the only holdup are the
> following authors' consent:
>
> Jim (copyright updates)
> Bruno - additional mingw porting in 2008
> myself - initial module implementation
>
> Any objections?

None here.
Though you don't need consent from me for that.

Reply via email to