Jim Meyering wrote: > > dev_t is an integral type. ... It could also be a floating-point type. > > As Paul said, I think we can be confident that this > is not a problem in practice.
Yes, I agree. While defining time_t to a floating-point type would have been understandable, for dev_t it would be outright stupid. My remark was purely theoretical. > Fine as well. Thanks! I've pushed the two changes. Bruno -- In memoriam Ismail Semed <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ismail_Semed>
