Paul Eggert wrote: > On 02/08/2011 02:54 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: >> Technically, the guard is required only for ino-map.h, due to its >> INO_MAP_INSERT_FAILURE definition > > Sorry, I don't understand this point. In C, it's OK to > #define the same macro twice, as long as the > two definitions are identical. Did some compiler > complain anyway?
Oh, you're right. I confused with typedefs. I can revert it, then. Or leave it... Do you have a preference?
