On 03/17/2011 08:29 PM, Bruno Haible wrote: >> Emacs is not intended to be portable to MingW and Cygwin. > Huh? How does this statement match the "GNU Emacs FAQ For MS Windows" [1], > section 2.4?
Ah, sorry, I was mistaken. I don't understand how Emacs is built on MS-DOS or MS-Windows (nor do I understand those operating systems; I don't use them), but a quick scout through the sources shows that there's a file nt/inc/sys/socket.h that already (I suppose) supports the part of <sys/socket.h> that Emacs needs. So perhaps a more accurate statement would be "Emacs does not need sys_socket".
