On 04/24/11 06:31, Bruno Haible wrote: > this is another case where a conditional dependency between > modules is needed, cf. what we talked about two weeks ago [1].
OK, but that will take some work, and in the meantime we have the problem now with Emacs. These patches patch are small, fix the Emacs problem, and are not that big a barrier to maintainability. We can revert them once we add extended-dependency tracking. And in the meantime we could add comments explaining the situation; surely that should suffice.
