Hi Pádraig, * Pádraig Brady wrote on Mon, May 16, 2011 at 04:44:42PM CEST: > On 14/05/11 09:07, Paul Eggert wrote: > >> If something treats symlink mtime as significant, > >> then I suspect that it's at fault. > > > > Yes, there's something busted there. GNU 'make' does the right thing: > > it follows symlinks when checking time stamps. Is some other 'make' > > is being used, or perhaps some tool other than 'make'? > > I suspect something else in the depths of auto* is busted, > as I'm using standard make.
GNU make, I presume. Is this issue still open? And if yes, how can it be reproduced? (Sorry, I haven't been following the thread really, but I still can't let a non-bug-report without details go uncommented. ;-) Cheers, Ralf
