Hi Eric, > diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog > index fcc2e6e..5f3ffb7 100644 > --- a/ChangeLog > +++ b/ChangeLog > @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ > +2011-07-01 Eric Blake <[email protected]> > + > + snprintf: guarantee %1$d, for libintl > + * m4/snprintf.m4 (gl_FUNC_SNPRINTF): Require %1$d support. > + * m4/vsnprintf.m4 (gl_FUNC_VSNPRINTF): Likewise. > + * doc/posix-functions/snprintf.texi (snprintf): Update. > + * doc/posix-functions/vsnprintf.texi (vsnprintf): Likewise. > + * tests/test-snprintf.c (main): Enhance test. > + * tests/test-vsnprintf.c (main): Likewise.
This patch is all right. I knew it was risky to provide an snprintf replacement in libintl that fixes the %n$ interpretation but not the return value, and on the other hand gnulib also may or may not replace snprintf... Thanks for all the analysis. The changes warrant some comments, but we can add them later. I'm too tired for today. Bruno -- In memoriam Yuri Shchekochikhin <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuri_Shchekochikhin>
