Re: [PATCH] posixtm: avoid compiler warning in a better way

[Thien-Thi Nguyen]

() Paul Eggert <egg...@cs.ucla.edu>
() Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:44:59 -0800

   Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:
   > Is there a performance advantage as well for ‘strchr’?

   Well, the call is smaller, and that's a performance win. :-)

   Seriously, though, it doesn't matter: this code is never a
   performance bottleneck, so simplicity is more important than
   efficiency here.

OK.  Thanks for explaining.  I guess i'll try to temper
my knee-jerk "‘strchr’ is evil" reaction in the future.

-- 
Thien-Thi Nguyen
   GPG key: 4C807502
   (if you're human and you know it)
      read my lisp: (responsep (questions 'technical)
                               (not (via 'mailing-list)))
                     => nil

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature