On 19/11/2016 11:26, Bruno Haible wrote: > Hi Paolo, > > For the 'frexpl-nolibm' module I also need your approval, since you > contributed lib/frexpl.c on 2003-02-18. > > Would you agree to relicense your initial lib/frexpl.c > under 'LGPLv3+ or GPLv2'? > Or possibly even under LGPLv2+? > > If you don't voice an objection within a week, I'll assume you agree.
LGPLv2+ is fine for any gnulib module I wrote. Paolo > > Bruno > >> It has been decided that libunistring is going to be relicensed under >> "dual LGPLv3+ or GPLv2" license. See >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libunistring/2016-11/msg00003.html >> >> To this effect, the libunistring modules in gnulib that are currently under >> LGPLv3+ need to be relicensed to 'LGPLv3+ or GPLv2'. Those modules that >> are under LGPLv2+ stay under LGPLv2+. >> >> 1) >> This proposed patch does this. It also extends gnulib-tool so that >> * the option --lgpl accepts the form --lgpl=3orGPLv2 >> * the compatibility checks consider this 'LGPLv3+ or GPLv2' license >> (namely, the allowed relicensings are: >> LGPLv2+ --> 'LGPLv3+ or GPLv2' >> 'LGPLv3+ or GPLv2' --> LGPLv3+ = LGPL >> 'LGPLv3+ or GPLv2' --> GPLv2+ >> 'LGPLv3+ or GPLv2' --> GPLv3+ = GPL >> >> 2) >> Some libunistring modules depend on gnulib modules with an LGPL license: >> >> unicase needs: >> >> Module Authors of the lib/* files (modulo trivial changes) >> memcmp2 Bruno >> amemxfrm Bruno >> >> unistdio needs: >> >> Module Authors of the lib/* files (modulo trivial changes) >> >> fpieee -- >> fpucw Bruno >> frexpl-nolibm Bruno >> frexp-nolibm Bruno >> isnand-nolibm Bruno, Paul, Eric, Ludovic >> isnanf-nolibm Bruno, Paul, Eric, Ludovic >> isnanl-nolibm Bruno, Paul, Eric, Ludovic >> printf-frexp Bruno >> printf-frexpl Bruno >> printf-safe -- >> signbit Bruno, Paul >> >> I am willing to relicense these modules to 'LGPLv3+ or GPLv2' or to the even >> weaker license LGPLv2+. >> >> lib/float+.h is already under LGPLv2+, per the modules 'integer_length' and >> 'vasnprintf'. >> >> === Paul, Eric, Ludovic, === >> >> Would you agree to relicense your changes to lib/isnan.c >> under 'LGPLv3+ or GPLv2'? >> Or possibly even under LGPLv2+? >> >> The history is here: >> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=history;f=lib/isnan.c >> >> Bruno > > -- > In memoriam Farhád Asdaqí > <http://www.iranhrdc.org/english/publications/reports/3149-a-faith-denied-the-persecution-of-the-baha-is-of-iran.html?p=29> > >