I just noticed the file lib/malloca.valgrind, which can be used with the
Valgrind option suppressions.

Marc

Am 22.08.2017 5:52 nachm. schrieb "Tim Rühsen" <tim.rueh...@gmx.de>:

> On Dienstag, 22. August 2017 06:11:41 CEST Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen wrote:
> > In freea in malloca.c, a possibly uninitialized indicator word is used
> for
> > a comparison so that Valgrind reports: "Conditional jump or move depends
> on
> > uninitialised value(s)".
> >
> > Valgrind is not smart enough to understand the logic in freea.
> >
> > It would be nice if the warning could be silenced, either by amending
> freea
> > slightly (it seems that a similar thing has already been done for Clang
> > warnings) or by reporting the issue to the Valgrind developers so that
> they
> > can special-case gnulib's freea.
>
> I also see several false positives from clang's Undefined Sanitizer due to
> alloca 'magic' (reallocations on stack space ?). This might not be directly
> related, but I think there is a common coding pattern.
>
> glob.c:1738:23: runtime error: index 64 out of bounds for type 'char *[64]'
>     #0 0x557545 in glob_in_dir /home/tim/src/wget2/lib/glob.c:1738:40
>     #1 0x54ded1 in rpl_glob /home/tim/src/wget2/lib/glob.c:1306:16
>
> SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior glob.c:1738:23 in
> glob.c:1739:27: runtime error: index 64 out of bounds for type 'char *[64]'
>     #0 0x5575d4 in glob_in_dir /home/tim/src/wget2/lib/glob.c:1739:27
>     #1 0x54ded1 in rpl_glob /home/tim/src/wget2/lib/glob.c:1306:16
>
> SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior glob.c:1739:27 in
> glob.c:1811:21: runtime error: index 64 out of bounds for type 'char *[64]'
>     #0 0x55845e in glob_in_dir /home/tim/src/wget2/lib/glob.c:1811:21
>     #1 0x54ded1 in rpl_glob /home/tim/src/wget2/lib/glob.c:1306:16
>
> Regards, Tim
>

Reply via email to