On 06/09/2017 01:18, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>> +enum glob_pattern_type_t
>> +{
>> + __GLOB_NONE = 0x0,
>> + __GLOB_SPECIAL = 0x1,
>> + __GLOB_BACKSLASH = 0x2,
>> + __GLOB_BRACKET = 0x4
>> +};
>
> The identifier glob_pattern_type_t is not used elsewhere, so let's omit it.
> This makes it clearer that we're merely defining handy names for int
> constants, as opposed to defining a new type.
Ack.
>
> Also, names like __GLOB_NONE could cause problems when Gnulib is used on
> non-GNU platforms, which might use those names for other purposes. As
> glob_internal.h is not user-visible, let's use ordinary names. I suggest
> GLOBPAT_NONE, GLOBPAT_SPECIAL, etc., as done in the attached patch, which I
> installed into Gnulib.
My understanding was double underscore identifiers are reserved for
implementation
(C99 7.1.3 Reserved identifiers). But I do not have a strong opinion here, I
am
ok with your approach.
