* Dmitry Selyutin <[email protected]> [170911 21:32]:
> Hi all,
> 
> > As explained above, this patch helps converge gnulib-tool.py and
> > gnulib-tool. There is a behavioural difference which I also consider to
> > be a regression, and hence a string need to fix it.
> Thanks for the patch! Looks perfectly fine from my side. Could you push it 
> into the repository, please?
> 
> > But we are not there yet. Maybe in one or two weeks, but not now.
> I think it is a way too optimistic forecast. Anyway, I do my best, though my 
> Python skills are a little bit rusty. :-)
> 
> > Dmitry's work with the Python script has been great
> Well, I wouldn't say after looking into the code, but at least it is working 
> somehow and can be a basic for a much better API. Remember that we're staying 
> on giants' shoulders, I've just rewritten what was created before in another 
> language. :-) Anyway, thank you for your kind words!
> 
> 
> -- 
> With best regards,
> Dmitry Selyutin

Bruno,

Could you please push this patch to master?


-- 
Thanking You,
Darshit Shah
PGP Fingerprint: 7845 120B 07CB D8D6 ECE5 FF2B 2A17 43ED A91A 35B6

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to