On Sat, 29 Dec 2018, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 05:23:09PM +0300, Ivan Zakharyaschev wrote:

> > As for the SIGILL peculiarity, it has a reason in the Elbrus architecture. 

> No, this particular case (++*argv[argc]) has nothing to do with tagged memory,
> I hope Ivan will share his findings here.

I've done it.

Thanks for your hints regarding a test for another kind of fault (SIGFPE) 
happenning speculatively, and regarding the hexadecimal values which are 
easy to detect visually (0xbad etc.)!

Best regards,

Reply via email to