On Sun, 2020-08-02 at 18:58 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> If I compare the configure output from a run with using the cache
> (fails) with one that doesn't use the cache (succeeds) the only
> difference of interest is:
>
> @@ -378,7 +379,7 @@
> checking whether program_invocation_name is declared... yes
> checking whether program_invocation_short_name is declared... yes
> checking for raise... yes
> -checking for sigprocmask... 1
> +checking for sigprocmask... yes
> checking for readline... yes
> checking how to link with libreadline... -lreadline
> checking for readline/readline.h... yes
> @@ -398,7 +399,7 @@
> checking for sighandler_t... yes
> checking for signbit macro... yes
> checking for signbit compiler built-ins... yes
> -checking for sigprocmask... 1
> +checking for sigprocmask... yes
> checking for stdint.h... yes
> checking for SIZE_MAX... yes
> checking for snprintf... yes
Sorry, this diff was from a cleaned-up version I was using for
comparison. It obviously should be:
-checking for sigprocmask... (cached) 1
+checking for sigprocmask... yes
...
-checking for sigprocmask... (cached) 1
+checking for sigprocmask... yes
