On Sun, 2020-08-02 at 18:58 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > If I compare the configure output from a run with using the cache > (fails) with one that doesn't use the cache (succeeds) the only > difference of interest is: > > @@ -378,7 +379,7 @@ > checking whether program_invocation_name is declared... yes > checking whether program_invocation_short_name is declared... yes > checking for raise... yes > -checking for sigprocmask... 1 > +checking for sigprocmask... yes > checking for readline... yes > checking how to link with libreadline... -lreadline > checking for readline/readline.h... yes > @@ -398,7 +399,7 @@ > checking for sighandler_t... yes > checking for signbit macro... yes > checking for signbit compiler built-ins... yes > -checking for sigprocmask... 1 > +checking for sigprocmask... yes > checking for stdint.h... yes > checking for SIZE_MAX... yes > checking for snprintf... yes
Sorry, this diff was from a cleaned-up version I was using for comparison. It obviously should be: -checking for sigprocmask... (cached) 1 +checking for sigprocmask... yes ... -checking for sigprocmask... (cached) 1 +checking for sigprocmask... yes