On Sun, 2020-08-02 at 18:58 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> If I compare the configure output from a run with using the cache
> (fails) with one that doesn't use the cache (succeeds) the only
> difference of interest is:
> 
>   @@ -378,7 +379,7 @@
>    checking whether program_invocation_name is declared... yes
>    checking whether program_invocation_short_name is declared... yes
>    checking for raise... yes
>   -checking for sigprocmask... 1
>   +checking for sigprocmask... yes
>    checking for readline... yes
>    checking how to link with libreadline... -lreadline
>    checking for readline/readline.h... yes
>   @@ -398,7 +399,7 @@
>    checking for sighandler_t... yes
>    checking for signbit macro... yes
>    checking for signbit compiler built-ins... yes
>   -checking for sigprocmask... 1
>   +checking for sigprocmask... yes
>    checking for stdint.h... yes
>    checking for SIZE_MAX... yes
>    checking for snprintf... yes

Sorry, this diff was from a cleaned-up version I was using for
comparison.  It obviously should be:

  -checking for sigprocmask... (cached) 1
  +checking for sigprocmask... yes
     ...
  -checking for sigprocmask... (cached) 1
  +checking for sigprocmask... yes



Reply via email to