On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 at 17:08, Reuben Thomas <r...@sc3d.org> wrote: > Good question! Looks like the code is relying on the definitions matching. > (I used one of the sample debugger stubs, which seems not to have been > changed for many years; meanwhile, gdb seems to have introduced its own > enumeration. I guess I'll look into this again at some point.) It doesn't > seem to matter much anyway, as GDB's remote stub communicator only seems to > ever use two concrete values. I guess the rest are just indicative. TBH > it's several months since I worked on the code and it was my first time > hacking inside GDB! >
Yes, looks like the example code is outdated, and I should be using include/gdb/signals.h rather than native signal.h. Thanks for raising this question, Eli! This means in any case that I don't have a use for these signal numbers on Windows. -- https://rrt.sc3d.org
