Paul Eggert wrote: > How about the attached, more-conservative patch instead? It limits > __cpp_static_assert to controlling the use of 'static_assert', and > causes C++ code to not use _Static_assert at all.
This one looks good. I agree that most C++ compilers have or will have 'static_assert', therefore using the fact that some clang versions support '_Static_assert' also in C++ mode is redundant. Bruno