Paul Eggert wrote:
> How about the attached, more-conservative patch instead? It limits 
> __cpp_static_assert to controlling the use of 'static_assert', and 
> causes C++ code to not use _Static_assert at all.

This one looks good. I agree that most C++ compilers have or will have
'static_assert', therefore using the fact that some clang versions support
'_Static_assert' also in C++ mode is redundant.

Bruno


Reply via email to