Hi Reuben,
> Rather than
>
> Red Hat, Debian, and similar package systems
> >
>
> would it make more sense to refer to
>
> "RPM, APT, and similar package systems"
>
> ? (i.e. refer to the package systems, not the GNU/Linux distros).
Well, the tool on Red Hat systems is not called 'rpm' any more.
Later it was called 'yum'. And now 'dnf'. And on Debian, 'dkpg'
is used together with 'apt'.
And if you mean the user-visible suffix of package files, then
you would need to write @code{.rpm}, @code{.deb}, and so on.
So, I think this way we don't achieve a doc improvement.
Bruno
