Bruno Haible <br...@clisp.org> writes: > The 'fts' module was not documented in the documentation, so far.
The gnulib fts is different from glibc API, and they can return different results when called the same way. See end of earlier thread here: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2021-07/msg00070.html I'm not sure what could be done. Perhaps adding a sentence to the gnulib documentation stating that the gnulib fts is not a drop-in replacement for missing fts functionality but a separate implementation with different behaviour. /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
