Hi, (GalaxyMaster) wrote: > backup-replace
You mean 'backup-rename', right? > I could not find any information on whether these modules are mutually > exclusive or inter-dependent Given the description of these two modules, it should be possible for a program to use one, or the other, or both. > I just stumbled upon the following: when I include both backupfile and > backup-replace modules I am getting a broken build due to multiple definitions > of "simple_backup_suffix'. This is not expected, because usually the .o files are collected in a .a file, from which one of the two backupfile.o will be picked, and it does not matter which one since they are identical. Please describe your situation: - operating system? - building what kind of library or binary in which way? - which compiler: $CC = ? $CFLAGS = ? $CPPFLAGS = ? $LDFLAGS = ? - which linker is being used by the compiler?, and show the precise error message log. Bruno
