> On 7 Feb 2023, at 12:06, Bruno Haible <br...@clisp.org> wrote: > > Thanks Paul, for reviewing what I wrote. > > Paul Eggert wrote: >>> * We should stop compiling with -Wstrict-prototypes and instead (not >>> always, >>> but frequently enough) compile with the '-std=gnu23' option. Clang >>> currently implements it better. GCC 13 may be on par with clang again on >>> this topic [1]. >> >> We could have 'configure' check -Wstrict-prototypes specially. If the >> compiler complains about the abovementioned style, 'configure' would >> omit -Wstrict-prototypes; otherwise it could keep it. The idea is that >> eventually GCC will be smart enough so that 'gcc -Wstrict-prototypes' >> will do the right thing even when not in C23 mode. > > Hmm, that would mean that GCC's implementation of -Wstrict-prototypes, > for older -std=... options, would change from GCC 12 to GCC 13. I doubt > they will want to do this. Therefore I filed another GCC bug report: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108694 > > (since https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108690 has already > been closed).
Thank you for doing this. I suspected we needed one At https://discourse.llvm.org/t/unresolved-issues-from-the-llvm-15-x-release/66071/40. Best, sam
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
