Hi Bruno, Thanks for the quick reply.
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 6:00 PM Bruno Haible <[email protected]> wrote: > I'll prepare a fix for the 'getopt-posix' module. However, for the > 'getopt-gnu' module we'll still want to have the same behaviour in > Gnulib as in glibc. Looking forward to the fix! > Here I need to give you a real-life advice. When someone communicates > with you, you should generally assume that they act in good faith, that > is, that they honestly mean what they say and that they have no goals > that they are hiding from you. Each time you assume someone is acting > in bad faith, but they are actually acting in good faith, you are > damaging or destroying your relation between that person and yourself. > > Eli's answer to you [5] was perfectly honest and adequate. You have no > reason to claim that he "just wanted you to go away". Sorry, I'm used to communicating in forums where my style (and faults) are well-known. That comment was made in jest. --Elad > > Bruno > > [1] https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/getopt.html > [2] https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/getopt.html > [3] > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=commitdiff;h=5cc0bcf5e4689e1fb0c23b8368c46fdae0402028 > [4] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2010-04/msg00272.html > [5] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2023-05/msg00404.html > > >
