> José E. Marchesi wrote: >> > Is this your intention? >> >> Yes, if the corresponding requirements of the GCS are still considered >> reasonable and pertinent. >> >> Otherwise, I would say we should update the standard in order to turn >> these requirements into suggestions. > > That's a valid answer. > > But what I wanted to know is: Now that we know that this patch will cause > work to (and may annoy) some people, should I commit it in your name?
Please. If people find cause to question the change, we can for sure discuss about it.
